https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253069 Repeatedly renewed fixed-term engagements for perennial work could not displace statutory retrenchment safeguards, so the termination was treated as retrenchment in breach of the Industrial Disputes Act. The court found the fixed-term contract exception inapplicable because the workmen had served for years without a real break and the employer had continued the same work through temporary engagement. Relief, however, was limited to compensation and costs rather than reinstatement, because no sanctioned post existed and the appointments were not against regular posts. en-us Tue, 01 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 12 Nov 2014 17:49:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253069 Repeatedly renewed fixed-term engagements for perennial work could not displace statutory retrenchment safeguards, so the termination was treated as retrenchment in breach of the Industrial Disputes Act. The court found the fixed-term contract exception inapplicable because the workmen had served for years without a real break and the employer had continued the same work through temporary engagement. Relief, however, was limited to compensation and costs rather than reinstatement, because no sanctioned post existed and the appointments were not against regular posts. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 01 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253069