<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1984 (3) TMI 379 - CEGAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166915</link>
    <description>Needle roller cages were treated as parts of rolling bearings rather than complete bearings, so they fell outside Tariff Item 49. The analysis turned on technical specifications, trade literature, catalogue evidence, and sample comparison, all showing that a cage functions only with a housing and shaft and cannot itself bear load as a bearing does. The phrase &quot;all sorts&quot; in Tariff Item 49 was read as covering different kinds of complete rolling bearings, not their parts, and because no specific entry covered bearing parts, the residuary tariff item applied. Needle roller cages were therefore classifiable under Tariff Item 68.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 12 Mar 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2014 12:47:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=368669" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1984 (3) TMI 379 - CEGAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166915</link>
      <description>Needle roller cages were treated as parts of rolling bearings rather than complete bearings, so they fell outside Tariff Item 49. The analysis turned on technical specifications, trade literature, catalogue evidence, and sample comparison, all showing that a cage functions only with a housing and shaft and cannot itself bear load as a bearing does. The phrase &quot;all sorts&quot; in Tariff Item 49 was read as covering different kinds of complete rolling bearings, not their parts, and because no specific entry covered bearing parts, the residuary tariff item applied. Needle roller cages were therefore classifiable under Tariff Item 68.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 12 Mar 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166915</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>