<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1984 (2) TMI 337 - CEGAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166904</link>
    <description>Where a notification granted concessional bunker exemption for furnace oil supplied to a vessel on a coastal voyage, the vessel&#039;s status had to be determined on the facts because neither &quot;coastal voyage&quot; nor &quot;vessel in the coastal run&quot; was statutorily defined. A vessel that arrived from a foreign port in water ballast, loaded Indian cargo at Bombay for discharge at Vizag and Calcutta, and then sailed abroad was treated as engaged in carriage between Indian ports for the relevant period. Its later foreign departure did not alter the character of that voyage, and the exemption under Notification No. 5/66 was available.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 29 Feb 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2014 18:08:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=368658" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1984 (2) TMI 337 - CEGAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166904</link>
      <description>Where a notification granted concessional bunker exemption for furnace oil supplied to a vessel on a coastal voyage, the vessel&#039;s status had to be determined on the facts because neither &quot;coastal voyage&quot; nor &quot;vessel in the coastal run&quot; was statutorily defined. A vessel that arrived from a foreign port in water ballast, loaded Indian cargo at Bombay for discharge at Vizag and Calcutta, and then sailed abroad was treated as engaged in carriage between Indian ports for the relevant period. Its later foreign departure did not alter the character of that voyage, and the exemption under Notification No. 5/66 was available.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Feb 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166904</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>