<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (11) TMI 381 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253064</link>
    <description>An authorised courier&#039;s revocation challenge failed where the writ petition omitted related customs proceedings and the petitioner had notice of the core allegations of missing authorisations, forged signatures, and use of another courier. The court held that admitted non-maintenance of records, use of another courier without prior written permission, and failure to produce authorisation documents constituted breaches of the Courier Imports and Exports (Clearances) Regulations, 1998. Regulation 14(1) therefore supported revocation of registration and forfeiture of security, while suspension was treated only as a temporary measure pending inquiry, not a substitute punishment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2015 17:40:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=368633" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (11) TMI 381 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253064</link>
      <description>An authorised courier&#039;s revocation challenge failed where the writ petition omitted related customs proceedings and the petitioner had notice of the core allegations of missing authorisations, forged signatures, and use of another courier. The court held that admitted non-maintenance of records, use of another courier without prior written permission, and failure to produce authorisation documents constituted breaches of the Courier Imports and Exports (Clearances) Regulations, 1998. Regulation 14(1) therefore supported revocation of registration and forfeiture of security, while suspension was treated only as a temporary measure pending inquiry, not a substitute punishment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253064</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>