https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253052 The Tribunal rectified a typographical error in a Final Order by acknowledging the omission of a second order, OIO No. 10/Dem/2002, which was beyond the limitation period. Despite the time-bar, the Tribunal recognized the identical issues in both orders and rectified the error based on High Court precedent and the case's merits. Both appeals were disposed of, and both orders were set aside, with the Tribunal directing certain words in the order to be read in the plural form. en-us Tue, 19 Aug 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 12 Nov 2014 12:55:24 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253052 The Tribunal rectified a typographical error in a Final Order by acknowledging the omission of a second order, OIO No. 10/Dem/2002, which was beyond the limitation period. Despite the time-bar, the Tribunal recognized the identical issues in both orders and rectified the error based on High Court precedent and the case's merits. Both appeals were disposed of, and both orders were set aside, with the Tribunal directing certain words in the order to be read in the plural form. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 19 Aug 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253052