<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (11) TMI 353 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253036</link>
    <description>The Court dismissed the appeal as it did not raise any substantial question of law. The judgment emphasized the importance of adhering to statutory timelines for reassessment and the necessity of valid grounds to support such actions. The Assessee&#039;s objection was upheld based on the lack of merit in the Revenue&#039;s contentions regarding deductions and the timing of the reassessment notice.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2014 08:19:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=368582" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (11) TMI 353 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253036</link>
      <description>The Court dismissed the appeal as it did not raise any substantial question of law. The judgment emphasized the importance of adhering to statutory timelines for reassessment and the necessity of valid grounds to support such actions. The Assessee&#039;s objection was upheld based on the lack of merit in the Revenue&#039;s contentions regarding deductions and the timing of the reassessment notice.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253036</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>