<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (11) TMI 346 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253029</link>
    <description>The appeal was partly allowed. The tribunal directed the exclusion of three contested companies from the list of comparables for transfer pricing adjustment and remanded the matter to the Transfer Pricing Officer/Assessing Officer for determining the Arm&#039;s Length Price with the remaining comparables. The disallowance under section 14A of the Income-tax Act, 1961 was upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2015 10:22:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=368575" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (11) TMI 346 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253029</link>
      <description>The appeal was partly allowed. The tribunal directed the exclusion of three contested companies from the list of comparables for transfer pricing adjustment and remanded the matter to the Transfer Pricing Officer/Assessing Officer for determining the Arm&#039;s Length Price with the remaining comparables. The disallowance under section 14A of the Income-tax Act, 1961 was upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253029</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>