<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (11) TMI 345 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253028</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee, confirming the payment of Rs. 75,00,000 as a redemption fine and not deemed income under Section 69C. The Tribunal held that the redemption fine was compensatory in nature and allowable as a business expenditure, sourced legitimately from the assessee&#039;s sister concern. The Tribunal emphasized that the fine enhanced the cost of goods and was not a penalty. The decision was rendered on 31st October 2014.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2014 08:18:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=368574" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (11) TMI 345 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253028</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee, confirming the payment of Rs. 75,00,000 as a redemption fine and not deemed income under Section 69C. The Tribunal held that the redemption fine was compensatory in nature and allowable as a business expenditure, sourced legitimately from the assessee&#039;s sister concern. The Tribunal emphasized that the fine enhanced the cost of goods and was not a penalty. The decision was rendered on 31st October 2014.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253028</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>