<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (11) TMI 339 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253022</link>
    <description>The appeal was filed against the disallowance of Fringe Benefit Tax (FBT) on various expenses for A.Y. 2007-08. The Appellate Tribunal remitted the issue back to the Assessing Officer for verification and appropriate decision on sales promotion, traveling, and conference expenses, following a previous ITAT order. The classification of foreign maintenance and staff training expenses for FBT was unclear, leading to a remittance for a clear determination. The Tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to decide on FBT values for specific expenses after providing the assessee an opportunity to be heard. Ultimately, the appeal was allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2014 08:18:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=368568" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (11) TMI 339 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253022</link>
      <description>The appeal was filed against the disallowance of Fringe Benefit Tax (FBT) on various expenses for A.Y. 2007-08. The Appellate Tribunal remitted the issue back to the Assessing Officer for verification and appropriate decision on sales promotion, traveling, and conference expenses, following a previous ITAT order. The classification of foreign maintenance and staff training expenses for FBT was unclear, leading to a remittance for a clear determination. The Tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to decide on FBT values for specific expenses after providing the assessee an opportunity to be heard. Ultimately, the appeal was allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253022</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>