<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (11) TMI 336 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253019</link>
    <description>Exemption notifications for services rendered in relation to transmission and distribution of electricity were construed broadly, with &quot;in relation to&quot; treated as having wide amplitude and &quot;for&quot; read as &quot;for the purpose of&quot;. Construction, maintenance and related works connected with substations and transmission activities were therefore covered by the exemption, while services unrelated to electricity transmission or distribution, including transformer station work for a sugar factory and GTA services, remained taxable. Because the dispute turned on interpretation of the exemption framework, penalties were considered unwarranted and were set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2015 14:53:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=368559" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (11) TMI 336 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253019</link>
      <description>Exemption notifications for services rendered in relation to transmission and distribution of electricity were construed broadly, with &quot;in relation to&quot; treated as having wide amplitude and &quot;for&quot; read as &quot;for the purpose of&quot;. Construction, maintenance and related works connected with substations and transmission activities were therefore covered by the exemption, while services unrelated to electricity transmission or distribution, including transformer station work for a sugar factory and GTA services, remained taxable. Because the dispute turned on interpretation of the exemption framework, penalties were considered unwarranted and were set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253019</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>