<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (11) TMI 326 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253009</link>
    <description>The court granted permission to clear the consignment subject to specific conditions, including payment of duties, differential duty, and a stay on redemption fine and penalties pending the appeal against the Order-in-Original. The court directed the release of the consignment upon compliance with the specified conditions, clarifying that the payment made would not prejudice the petitioner&#039;s rights in the pending appeal. The petitioner&#039;s request for a waiver of redemption charges was not entertained as it fell outside the scope of the writ petition, leaving the petitioner to pursue that remedy independently. Ultimately, the writ petition was disposed of with specified directions and observations, without imposing any costs on either party.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2014 18:56:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=368549" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (11) TMI 326 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253009</link>
      <description>The court granted permission to clear the consignment subject to specific conditions, including payment of duties, differential duty, and a stay on redemption fine and penalties pending the appeal against the Order-in-Original. The court directed the release of the consignment upon compliance with the specified conditions, clarifying that the payment made would not prejudice the petitioner&#039;s rights in the pending appeal. The petitioner&#039;s request for a waiver of redemption charges was not entertained as it fell outside the scope of the writ petition, leaving the petitioner to pursue that remedy independently. Ultimately, the writ petition was disposed of with specified directions and observations, without imposing any costs on either party.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253009</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>