<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (11) TMI 318 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253001</link>
    <description>The High Court dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal challenging the deletion of an addition of Rs. 4,07,92,581/- for assessment year 2005-06 by the ITAT. The court upheld the factual findings of the ITAT and C.I.T (Appeals) and found no grounds to issue notice in the appeal. Additionally, the court ruled in favor of the assessee regarding the validity of expenses claimed and the applicability of TDS provisions on contractual payments, citing lack of sufficient evidence and proper invocation of relevant tax provisions by the Revenue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2014 07:57:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=368498" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (11) TMI 318 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253001</link>
      <description>The High Court dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal challenging the deletion of an addition of Rs. 4,07,92,581/- for assessment year 2005-06 by the ITAT. The court upheld the factual findings of the ITAT and C.I.T (Appeals) and found no grounds to issue notice in the appeal. Additionally, the court ruled in favor of the assessee regarding the validity of expenses claimed and the applicability of TDS provisions on contractual payments, citing lack of sufficient evidence and proper invocation of relevant tax provisions by the Revenue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253001</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>