<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (11) TMI 315 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=252998</link>
    <description>The tribunal allowed all appeals filed by the assessees, directing the AO to delete the addition of Rs. 1,02,50,000 under Section 69B of the Income Tax Act and give credit of Rs. 50,00,000 each against unexplained cash and jewellery. The judgment underscores the significance of meticulous evidence examination and objective assessment in tax matters.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2014 10:14:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=368495" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (11) TMI 315 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=252998</link>
      <description>The tribunal allowed all appeals filed by the assessees, directing the AO to delete the addition of Rs. 1,02,50,000 under Section 69B of the Income Tax Act and give credit of Rs. 50,00,000 each against unexplained cash and jewellery. The judgment underscores the significance of meticulous evidence examination and objective assessment in tax matters.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=252998</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>