https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=252986 The Tribunal held that despite the appellant using an alternate method for production due to small orders, the benefit of exemption under notification no. 50/03-CE could not be denied as production and sale of goods were acknowledged by the Department. The Tribunal found the appellant had a strong prima facie case, waiving the pre-deposit requirement for the appeal and staying recovery. The stay application was allowed, ruling in favor of the appellant in the dispute over exemption eligibility for their unit manufacturing polymer-based soil stabilizer in Uttrakhand. en-us Mon, 28 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 10 Nov 2014 16:03:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=252986 The Tribunal held that despite the appellant using an alternate method for production due to small orders, the benefit of exemption under notification no. 50/03-CE could not be denied as production and sale of goods were acknowledged by the Department. The Tribunal found the appellant had a strong prima facie case, waiving the pre-deposit requirement for the appeal and staying recovery. The stay application was allowed, ruling in favor of the appellant in the dispute over exemption eligibility for their unit manufacturing polymer-based soil stabilizer in Uttrakhand. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 28 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=252986