https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=252985 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the Revenue, directing the appellant to pay the difference between the duty paid and the actual payable amount on TV sets returned for repair/remanufacture. The appellant's argument that they had paid a portion of the duty difference was rejected, with the Tribunal emphasizing the need for proper record verification and the reversal of the entire Cenvat credit amount taken on the returned TV sets. The appellant was instructed to pay the outstanding interest on the differential amount within a specified timeframe to avoid penalties and recovery actions. en-us Mon, 21 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 10 Nov 2014 18:32:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=252985 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the Revenue, directing the appellant to pay the difference between the duty paid and the actual payable amount on TV sets returned for repair/remanufacture. The appellant's argument that they had paid a portion of the duty difference was rejected, with the Tribunal emphasizing the need for proper record verification and the reversal of the entire Cenvat credit amount taken on the returned TV sets. The appellant was instructed to pay the outstanding interest on the differential amount within a specified timeframe to avoid penalties and recovery actions. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 21 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=252985