<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (11) TMI 300 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=252983</link>
    <description>Old and used propping pipes classified under CTH 7308 4000 were treated as equipment used for scaffolding, shuttering and propping, and therefore as capital goods under the Foreign Trade Policy 2004-09. Because second-hand capital goods are freely importable and the goods were imported for use in construction service, confiscation was not justified and the associated redemption fine and penalty were set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2014 11:53:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=368468" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (11) TMI 300 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=252983</link>
      <description>Old and used propping pipes classified under CTH 7308 4000 were treated as equipment used for scaffolding, shuttering and propping, and therefore as capital goods under the Foreign Trade Policy 2004-09. Because second-hand capital goods are freely importable and the goods were imported for use in construction service, confiscation was not justified and the associated redemption fine and penalty were set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=252983</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>