<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1984 (1) TMI 316 - CEGAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166855</link>
    <description>A conclusive direction affecting customs duty liability was treated as an appealable order under Section 129A, even though it was not supported by a detailed independent merits discussion, so the maintainability objection failed. For tariff classification, rock-phosphate imported in lumpy form for fertiliser manufacture was held classifiable by its essential manurial use rather than its physical form, because no tariff entry required powder form as a condition; it therefore fell under Item 35 and not the residuary Item 87. Auxiliary duty was payable at 5% instead of 15%, and the impugned order was set aside with consequential relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 27 Jan 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2014 12:25:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=368465" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1984 (1) TMI 316 - CEGAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166855</link>
      <description>A conclusive direction affecting customs duty liability was treated as an appealable order under Section 129A, even though it was not supported by a detailed independent merits discussion, so the maintainability objection failed. For tariff classification, rock-phosphate imported in lumpy form for fertiliser manufacture was held classifiable by its essential manurial use rather than its physical form, because no tariff entry required powder form as a condition; it therefore fell under Item 35 and not the residuary Item 87. Auxiliary duty was payable at 5% instead of 15%, and the impugned order was set aside with consequential relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Jan 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166855</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>