https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166848 Curtailment of revisional jurisdiction under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure does not abrogate the High Court's constitutional powers under Articles 226 and 227. Interlocutory orders of subordinate civil courts may still be challenged where there is absence or excess of jurisdiction, flagrant disregard of law or procedure, violation of natural justice, or a manifest patent error causing grave injustice. Article 227 superintendence is wider than certiorari, but it must be exercised sparingly and not as a substitute for appeal. Alternative remedy and interlocutory character are relevant self-imposed restraints, not bars to constitutional review. en-us Thu, 07 Aug 2003 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 26 Sep 2025 16:45:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166848 Curtailment of revisional jurisdiction under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure does not abrogate the High Court's constitutional powers under Articles 226 and 227. Interlocutory orders of subordinate civil courts may still be challenged where there is absence or excess of jurisdiction, flagrant disregard of law or procedure, violation of natural justice, or a manifest patent error causing grave injustice. Article 227 superintendence is wider than certiorari, but it must be exercised sparingly and not as a substitute for appeal. Alternative remedy and interlocutory character are relevant self-imposed restraints, not bars to constitutional review. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 07 Aug 2003 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166848