<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1983 (11) TMI 312 - CEGAT BOMBAY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166834</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants, holding that the imported non-sterilized surgical threads were considered raw materials for manufacturing sterilized sutures and thus covered by the import license. The Tribunal allowed the appeal, directing the refund of the redemption fine if already paid by the appellants within three months.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 07 Nov 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2014 16:39:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=368430" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1983 (11) TMI 312 - CEGAT BOMBAY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166834</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants, holding that the imported non-sterilized surgical threads were considered raw materials for manufacturing sterilized sutures and thus covered by the import license. The Tribunal allowed the appeal, directing the refund of the redemption fine if already paid by the appellants within three months.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 Nov 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166834</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>