<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1983 (11) TMI 310 - CEGAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166832</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the Appellants, determining that copper alloy wires should be classified under Item 68 instead of Item 33B. Additionally, the Tribunal agreed with the Appellants that scrap of wires should be classified under Item 26A(ib) rather than Item 68. The decision set aside the Appellate Collector&#039;s order and provided clarity on the correct Tariff Items for the disputed scraps and wires.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 01 Nov 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2014 16:22:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=368428" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1983 (11) TMI 310 - CEGAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166832</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the Appellants, determining that copper alloy wires should be classified under Item 68 instead of Item 33B. Additionally, the Tribunal agreed with the Appellants that scrap of wires should be classified under Item 26A(ib) rather than Item 68. The decision set aside the Appellate Collector&#039;s order and provided clarity on the correct Tariff Items for the disputed scraps and wires.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Nov 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166832</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>