https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166828 For licensing of a partnership firm under the gold control regime, the relevant consideration was the expertise available in the firm as a whole, not the independent experience of each proposed partner. Where one partner was already a licensed gold dealer, the firm was treated as having the requisite background and competence for grant or continuance of the licence. On that footing, a partner's personal lack of experience could not by itself justify refusal of inclusion in the firm's gold dealer licence, and the licensing objection based solely on individual experience was unsustainable. en-us Tue, 25 Oct 1983 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 07 Nov 2014 12:10:13 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166828 For licensing of a partnership firm under the gold control regime, the relevant consideration was the expertise available in the firm as a whole, not the independent experience of each proposed partner. Where one partner was already a licensed gold dealer, the firm was treated as having the requisite background and competence for grant or continuance of the licence. On that footing, a partner's personal lack of experience could not by itself justify refusal of inclusion in the firm's gold dealer licence, and the licensing objection based solely on individual experience was unsustainable. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 25 Oct 1983 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166828