<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1983 (10) TMI 258 - CEGAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166823</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the application for stay, clarified its jurisdiction in dispensing with deposits and granting stays, and resolved issues related to the delay in filing the appeal and interpretation of the limitation period. The decision emphasized adherence to statutory provisions and ensuring no prejudice to either party during the appeal process.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 10 Oct 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2014 11:23:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=368419" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1983 (10) TMI 258 - CEGAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166823</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the application for stay, clarified its jurisdiction in dispensing with deposits and granting stays, and resolved issues related to the delay in filing the appeal and interpretation of the limitation period. The decision emphasized adherence to statutory provisions and ensuring no prejudice to either party during the appeal process.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Oct 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166823</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>