<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1983 (12) TMI 304 - CEGAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166821</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the assessment of acrylic sheets crushed scrap to countervailing (CV) duty under Item 15A(2) of the Central Excise Tariff was incorrect and ordered it to be struck down. The Tribunal allowed the Custom House to re-examine the classification of the crushed sheet scrap under any other suitable item of the CET. All eight appeals were disposed of accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 27 Dec 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2014 11:03:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=368417" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1983 (12) TMI 304 - CEGAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166821</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the assessment of acrylic sheets crushed scrap to countervailing (CV) duty under Item 15A(2) of the Central Excise Tariff was incorrect and ordered it to be struck down. The Tribunal allowed the Custom House to re-examine the classification of the crushed sheet scrap under any other suitable item of the CET. All eight appeals were disposed of accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Dec 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166821</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>