<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (11) TMI 297 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=252980</link>
    <description>The court granted the petition seeking a writ of certiorarified mandamus, annulling the proceedings and restraining the recovery of disputed demands related to assessment orders for specific years. The petitioner, a company under the Indian Companies Act,1956, had pending appeals against these orders and had filed a stay petition under the Income Tax Act, 1961. Despite a demand for payment during the stay petition&#039;s pendency, the court directed the appellate authority to thoroughly evaluate the stay petition, provide a reasoned decision after a personal hearing, and annulled the impugned orders, instructing a reevaluation of the stay petition by the respondents.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2014 06:35:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=368405" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (11) TMI 297 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=252980</link>
      <description>The court granted the petition seeking a writ of certiorarified mandamus, annulling the proceedings and restraining the recovery of disputed demands related to assessment orders for specific years. The petitioner, a company under the Indian Companies Act,1956, had pending appeals against these orders and had filed a stay petition under the Income Tax Act, 1961. Despite a demand for payment during the stay petition&#039;s pendency, the court directed the appellate authority to thoroughly evaluate the stay petition, provide a reasoned decision after a personal hearing, and annulled the impugned orders, instructing a reevaluation of the stay petition by the respondents.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=252980</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>