<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (11) TMI 286 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=252969</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the revenue&#039;s appeal, reducing disallowances on labour charges and site expenses to Rs. 2 lakh and Rs. 50,000, respectively. The Tribunal upheld deletions regarding retention money and purchase expenses, emphasizing the importance of consistency in accounting practices and the need for substantial evidence to support disallowances.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 21 Oct 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2014 06:34:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=368394" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (11) TMI 286 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=252969</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the revenue&#039;s appeal, reducing disallowances on labour charges and site expenses to Rs. 2 lakh and Rs. 50,000, respectively. The Tribunal upheld deletions regarding retention money and purchase expenses, emphasizing the importance of consistency in accounting practices and the need for substantial evidence to support disallowances.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Oct 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=252969</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>