<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (11) TMI 275 - ITAT COCHIN</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=252958</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision, ruling that the commission paid to foreign agents was not taxable in India as the services were rendered outside the country and no income accrued within India. Without evidence of taxability in India, the Tribunal deemed the disallowance under section 40(a)(ia) unnecessary, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 19 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2015 13:08:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=368377" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (11) TMI 275 - ITAT COCHIN</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=252958</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision, ruling that the commission paid to foreign agents was not taxable in India as the services were rendered outside the country and no income accrued within India. Without evidence of taxability in India, the Tribunal deemed the disallowance under section 40(a)(ia) unnecessary, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=252958</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>