<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (11) TMI 273 - ITAT PANAJI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=252956</link>
    <description>The tribunal dismissed the department&#039;s appeal, affirming the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the addition of Rs. 47,85,000 made by the AO. The tribunal emphasized the importance of assessments being grounded in comprehensive and factual records rather than presumptions and surmises. The final judgment was pronounced on 8.8.2014.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 08 Nov 2014 06:25:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=368365" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (11) TMI 273 - ITAT PANAJI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=252956</link>
      <description>The tribunal dismissed the department&#039;s appeal, affirming the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the addition of Rs. 47,85,000 made by the AO. The tribunal emphasized the importance of assessments being grounded in comprehensive and factual records rather than presumptions and surmises. The final judgment was pronounced on 8.8.2014.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=252956</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>