<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (11) TMI 267 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=252950</link>
    <description>The High Court ruled in favor of the Assessee, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeals. It held that undisclosed income discovered post-search and survey, unrelated to the search findings, should be subject to regular assessment rather than block assessment. The Court emphasized the significance of the source of incriminating material in determining the appropriate assessment method, ensuring fair tax treatment based on the circumstances of discovery.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 08 May 2015 15:51:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=368359" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (11) TMI 267 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=252950</link>
      <description>The High Court ruled in favor of the Assessee, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeals. It held that undisclosed income discovered post-search and survey, unrelated to the search findings, should be subject to regular assessment rather than block assessment. The Court emphasized the significance of the source of incriminating material in determining the appropriate assessment method, ensuring fair tax treatment based on the circumstances of discovery.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=252950</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>