<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (11) TMI 258 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=252941</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee in all three cases, determining that the surpluses from the sales of lands at Dhamane, Kondhwa, and Sanswadi should be treated as capital gains or exempt as agricultural land, rather than business income. The Tribunal held that the lands were investments and not stock-in-trade, following precedents from the Bombay High Court. The lower authorities&#039; decisions were overturned, and the assessees&#039; returns were reinstated accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 08 Nov 2014 06:57:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=368350" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (11) TMI 258 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=252941</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee in all three cases, determining that the surpluses from the sales of lands at Dhamane, Kondhwa, and Sanswadi should be treated as capital gains or exempt as agricultural land, rather than business income. The Tribunal held that the lands were investments and not stock-in-trade, following precedents from the Bombay High Court. The lower authorities&#039; decisions were overturned, and the assessees&#039; returns were reinstated accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=252941</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>