<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (11) TMI 244 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=252927</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the duty demand concerning the inclusion of amortized cost of dies and moulds in the assessable value of plastic molded components. However, the penalty imposed on the appellant was reduced to 25% under Section 11AC, in line with the judgment of the Hon&#039;ble Delhi High Court in K.P. Pouches (P) Ltd. vs. Union of India.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2016 12:51:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=368326" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (11) TMI 244 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=252927</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the duty demand concerning the inclusion of amortized cost of dies and moulds in the assessable value of plastic molded components. However, the penalty imposed on the appellant was reduced to 25% under Section 11AC, in line with the judgment of the Hon&#039;ble Delhi High Court in K.P. Pouches (P) Ltd. vs. Union of India.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=252927</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>