<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (11) TMI 240 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=252923</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the addition of Rs. 26,23,703/- in respect of interest on sticky advances, ruling in favor of the assessee, a co-operative bank. The Tribunal relied on legal precedents and interpretations, including Section 43D of the Income Tax Act and relevant case law, to support the non-taxability of interest on non-performing assets. Emphasizing the concept of &quot;real income,&quot; the Tribunal concluded that since the interest on sticky advances had not materialized, it should not be taxed. Consequently, the Tribunal dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal and affirmed the CIT(A)&#039;s order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2014 18:50:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=368321" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (11) TMI 240 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=252923</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the addition of Rs. 26,23,703/- in respect of interest on sticky advances, ruling in favor of the assessee, a co-operative bank. The Tribunal relied on legal precedents and interpretations, including Section 43D of the Income Tax Act and relevant case law, to support the non-taxability of interest on non-performing assets. Emphasizing the concept of &quot;real income,&quot; the Tribunal concluded that since the interest on sticky advances had not materialized, it should not be taxed. Consequently, the Tribunal dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal and affirmed the CIT(A)&#039;s order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=252923</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>