<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (11) TMI 236 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=252919</link>
    <description>The tribunal upheld the excise duty demand against the appellant for the period 2010-2011, denying the benefit of SSI exemption Notification No.08/2003 for fabrication of aluminium structures and glass facades. The appellant was directed to make a pre-deposit of Rs. 3.00 lakhs, with an additional Rs. 50,000 to be paid within six weeks. Compliance within the specified timeframe was emphasized to avoid dismissal of the appeal without further notice.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 03 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2014 18:29:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=368316" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (11) TMI 236 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=252919</link>
      <description>The tribunal upheld the excise duty demand against the appellant for the period 2010-2011, denying the benefit of SSI exemption Notification No.08/2003 for fabrication of aluminium structures and glass facades. The appellant was directed to make a pre-deposit of Rs. 3.00 lakhs, with an additional Rs. 50,000 to be paid within six weeks. Compliance within the specified timeframe was emphasized to avoid dismissal of the appeal without further notice.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=252919</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>