<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (11) TMI 224 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=252907</link>
    <description>The High Court dismissed the Tax Case (Appeal) as no substantial question of law arose, affirming the Tribunal&#039;s decision that the rectification of the excess billing error did not constitute a bad debt write-off. The Court emphasized that the excess amount was not recoverable and did not involve a transaction of bad debt, thereby upholding the Tribunal&#039;s decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 May 2015 18:33:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=368281" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (11) TMI 224 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=252907</link>
      <description>The High Court dismissed the Tax Case (Appeal) as no substantial question of law arose, affirming the Tribunal&#039;s decision that the rectification of the excess billing error did not constitute a bad debt write-off. The Court emphasized that the excess amount was not recoverable and did not involve a transaction of bad debt, thereby upholding the Tribunal&#039;s decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=252907</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>