<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (11) TMI 215 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=252898</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to quash the reassessment proceedings and the notice under Section 148. It found that the Assessing Officer (AO) failed to apply an independent mind, violated principles of natural justice, and exceeded the jurisdiction intended under Section 147. Consequently, the reassessment and the additions made therein were deemed invalid.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2014 22:05:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=368272" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (11) TMI 215 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=252898</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to quash the reassessment proceedings and the notice under Section 148. It found that the Assessing Officer (AO) failed to apply an independent mind, violated principles of natural justice, and exceeded the jurisdiction intended under Section 147. Consequently, the reassessment and the additions made therein were deemed invalid.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=252898</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>