<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (11) TMI 207 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=252890</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants, a partnership firm, in a case concerning the taxation of trademarks&#039; use and partners&#039; contributions. It determined that the partnership firm, not being a separate legal entity from its partners, did not engage in taxable services under the &#039;intellectual property rights service&#039; and &#039;business support service&#039; categories. The Tribunal emphasized the joint-venture nature of partnerships and the absence of a distinct service provider-receiver relationship, leading to the waiver of predeposit and a stay against recovery of service tax and penalties.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2016 18:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=368253" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (11) TMI 207 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=252890</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants, a partnership firm, in a case concerning the taxation of trademarks&#039; use and partners&#039; contributions. It determined that the partnership firm, not being a separate legal entity from its partners, did not engage in taxable services under the &#039;intellectual property rights service&#039; and &#039;business support service&#039; categories. The Tribunal emphasized the joint-venture nature of partnerships and the absence of a distinct service provider-receiver relationship, leading to the waiver of predeposit and a stay against recovery of service tax and penalties.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=252890</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>