https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=252884 The Tribunal affirmed the necessity of pre-deposit compliance as a condition for waiver of adjudicated liabilities, dismissing appeals for failure to pre-deposit under Section 35F of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The High Court upheld the pre-deposit order, granting an extended timeline for compliance. While some appellants, like M/s Gopal Steel, adhered to the pre-deposit directive, others, including M/s Seleno Steels Ltd., faced dismissal for non-compliance despite challenging the order. The Tribunal emphasized the binding nature of pre-deposit obligations unless overridden by a Superior Court, underscoring the significance of timely compliance with adjudication orders. en-us Mon, 15 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 01 Dec 2015 15:00:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=252884 The Tribunal affirmed the necessity of pre-deposit compliance as a condition for waiver of adjudicated liabilities, dismissing appeals for failure to pre-deposit under Section 35F of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The High Court upheld the pre-deposit order, granting an extended timeline for compliance. While some appellants, like M/s Gopal Steel, adhered to the pre-deposit directive, others, including M/s Seleno Steels Ltd., faced dismissal for non-compliance despite challenging the order. The Tribunal emphasized the binding nature of pre-deposit obligations unless overridden by a Superior Court, underscoring the significance of timely compliance with adjudication orders. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 15 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=252884