<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (11) TMI 177 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=252860</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee, a credit cooperative society, and directed the Assessing Officer to grant the deduction under Section 80P(2)(a)(i) of the Income Tax Act. The decision was based on the interpretation that the assessee did not fall under the classification of a cooperative bank under Section 80P(4) and was eligible for the deduction. The Tribunal relied on legislative intent, CBDT clarification, and judicial precedents to support its decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2014 05:51:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=368218" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (11) TMI 177 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=252860</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee, a credit cooperative society, and directed the Assessing Officer to grant the deduction under Section 80P(2)(a)(i) of the Income Tax Act. The decision was based on the interpretation that the assessee did not fall under the classification of a cooperative bank under Section 80P(4) and was eligible for the deduction. The Tribunal relied on legislative intent, CBDT clarification, and judicial precedents to support its decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=252860</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>