<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1983 (11) TMI 304 - CEGAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166804</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the demand raised by the Assistant Collector for duty on goods classified as colloidal sodium silicate, ruling that the denial of exemption under Notification 154/70 was unjustified. The Tribunal found discrepancies in the test report and clarified that being a colloid does not exclude sodium silicate from being refined. As a result, the Collector (Appeals)&#039;s order and the demand were deemed untenable, leading to their dismissal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2014 15:51:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=368196" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1983 (11) TMI 304 - CEGAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166804</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the demand raised by the Assistant Collector for duty on goods classified as colloidal sodium silicate, ruling that the denial of exemption under Notification 154/70 was unjustified. The Tribunal found discrepancies in the test report and clarified that being a colloid does not exclude sodium silicate from being refined. As a result, the Collector (Appeals)&#039;s order and the demand were deemed untenable, leading to their dismissal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166804</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>