<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1983 (11) TMI 303 - CEGAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166803</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants, classifying the &#039;Funditor Marking Machine&#039; under Heading 84.45/48 instead of 84.59(1) as claimed by Customs authorities. This reclassification led to the appellants being granted a refund.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2014 15:47:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=368195" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1983 (11) TMI 303 - CEGAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166803</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants, classifying the &#039;Funditor Marking Machine&#039; under Heading 84.45/48 instead of 84.59(1) as claimed by Customs authorities. This reclassification led to the appellants being granted a refund.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166803</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>