<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1983 (12) TMI 286 - CEGAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166795</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, set aside the Appellate Collector&#039;s order, and directed the respondents to repay the erroneously refunded amount to the Collector of Customs, Bombay, within three months. The Tribunal upheld the applicability of the time limit under Section 27(1) for refund claims and clarified that the notice under Section 131(3) was not time-barred.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 08 Dec 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2014 12:13:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=368187" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1983 (12) TMI 286 - CEGAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166795</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, set aside the Appellate Collector&#039;s order, and directed the respondents to repay the erroneously refunded amount to the Collector of Customs, Bombay, within three months. The Tribunal upheld the applicability of the time limit under Section 27(1) for refund claims and clarified that the notice under Section 131(3) was not time-barred.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Dec 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166795</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>