<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1983 (9) TMI 312 - CEGAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166783</link>
    <description>Processing steel tubes into rings through machining, turning and related operations creates outer races with a distinct name, character and use, amounting to manufacture. Such goods remain excisable under the residuary tariff entry even if further processing occurs at the buyer&#039;s factory, production is to special specifications, or sales are limited rather than made to the general public. Awareness of excisability, failure to seek classification or clarification, and evidence suggesting concealed removal support a finding of contravention and penalty for evasion. Duty liability on the outer races and the associated penalty were sustained, and the appeal failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 29 Sep 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2014 18:17:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=368175" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1983 (9) TMI 312 - CEGAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166783</link>
      <description>Processing steel tubes into rings through machining, turning and related operations creates outer races with a distinct name, character and use, amounting to manufacture. Such goods remain excisable under the residuary tariff entry even if further processing occurs at the buyer&#039;s factory, production is to special specifications, or sales are limited rather than made to the general public. Awareness of excisability, failure to seek classification or clarification, and evidence suggesting concealed removal support a finding of contravention and penalty for evasion. Duty liability on the outer races and the associated penalty were sustained, and the appeal failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Sep 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166783</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>