https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=252850 The Tribunal set aside the order and remanded the case for fresh adjudication. The appellants were directed to produce documentary evidence for the benefit under Notification No. 12/2003-ST. The Tribunal upheld the denial of benefits under Notifications No. 15/2004-ST and No. 1/2006-ST due to lack of contestation. The Tribunal agreed with the finding of suppression of facts to evade service tax. The Tribunal rejected the argument on the non-applicability of service tax on composite contracts pre-01.06.2007, emphasizing the need to bifurcate and tax the service component. The case was remanded for reevaluation of the service tax demand and penalties. en-us Wed, 15 Oct 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 09 Sep 2015 14:32:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=252850 The Tribunal set aside the order and remanded the case for fresh adjudication. The appellants were directed to produce documentary evidence for the benefit under Notification No. 12/2003-ST. The Tribunal upheld the denial of benefits under Notifications No. 15/2004-ST and No. 1/2006-ST due to lack of contestation. The Tribunal agreed with the finding of suppression of facts to evade service tax. The Tribunal rejected the argument on the non-applicability of service tax on composite contracts pre-01.06.2007, emphasizing the need to bifurcate and tax the service component. The case was remanded for reevaluation of the service tax demand and penalties. Case-Laws Service Tax Wed, 15 Oct 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=252850