<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (11) TMI 142 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=252825</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, deleting the additions of Rs. 1,41,80,926 as income under Section 68 and Rs. 20,00,000 as income from undisclosed sources. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of cross-examination and independent analysis of facts, aligning with the principles of natural justice and previous judicial decisions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2014 06:26:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=368119" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (11) TMI 142 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=252825</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, deleting the additions of Rs. 1,41,80,926 as income under Section 68 and Rs. 20,00,000 as income from undisclosed sources. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of cross-examination and independent analysis of facts, aligning with the principles of natural justice and previous judicial decisions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=252825</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>