<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (11) TMI 139 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=252822</link>
    <description>The appeal filed by the assessee was allowed, and the disallowance of Rs. 26,79,20,745/- under Section 40A(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 was deleted. The Tribunal found that the assessee fell within the exceptions provided in Rule 6DD(e)(ii) for meat purchases, supported by certificates from relevant authorities. Other observations on purchase rates and by-product sales were not upheld, leading to the deletion of the disallowance.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2014 06:25:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=368116" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (11) TMI 139 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=252822</link>
      <description>The appeal filed by the assessee was allowed, and the disallowance of Rs. 26,79,20,745/- under Section 40A(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 was deleted. The Tribunal found that the assessee fell within the exceptions provided in Rule 6DD(e)(ii) for meat purchases, supported by certificates from relevant authorities. Other observations on purchase rates and by-product sales were not upheld, leading to the deletion of the disallowance.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=252822</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>