<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1983 (9) TMI 309 - CEGAT BOMBAY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166780</link>
    <description>The appeal challenging the warning issued by the Addl. Collector regarding the re-export of goods was deemed incompetent and rejected by the Tribunal. The Tribunal held that the warning was an executive direction and not a decision or order under the Customs Act, making it non-appealable. The appellants&#039; contention that the warning was unauthorized and illegal was dismissed, emphasizing that the warning fell outside the scope of appealable orders to the Tribunal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 24 Sep 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2014 16:56:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=368102" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1983 (9) TMI 309 - CEGAT BOMBAY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166780</link>
      <description>The appeal challenging the warning issued by the Addl. Collector regarding the re-export of goods was deemed incompetent and rejected by the Tribunal. The Tribunal held that the warning was an executive direction and not a decision or order under the Customs Act, making it non-appealable. The appellants&#039; contention that the warning was unauthorized and illegal was dismissed, emphasizing that the warning fell outside the scope of appealable orders to the Tribunal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 24 Sep 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166780</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>