<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1983 (11) TMI 297 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166774</link>
    <description>The court ruled in favor of the petitioners, upholding the applicability of Section 13 of the Customs Act in cases of pilferage post-unloading. The court rejected the objection on the petition&#039;s maintainability due to prolonged proceedings and uncertainty over appeal resolution timelines. The Customs order demanding duty payment for pilfered goods was set aside, and the deposited amount was ordered to be refunded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 22 Nov 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2014 15:49:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=368095" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1983 (11) TMI 297 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166774</link>
      <description>The court ruled in favor of the petitioners, upholding the applicability of Section 13 of the Customs Act in cases of pilferage post-unloading. The court rejected the objection on the petition&#039;s maintainability due to prolonged proceedings and uncertainty over appeal resolution timelines. The Customs order demanding duty payment for pilfered goods was set aside, and the deposited amount was ordered to be refunded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Nov 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166774</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>