https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166773 The court denied the petitioners' claim for remission of demurrage charges during a strike period at the Port of Bombay. The court found that the petitioners failed to demonstrate sufficient cause for remission due to their delay in seeking relief, lack of urgency, and the absence of staff participation in the strike. The court dismissed the claim based on laches, emphasizing the importance of timely action and specific circumstances in rejecting the petitioners' request. The court ruled in favor of the respondents, discharging the rule with no order as to costs. en-us Tue, 29 Nov 1983 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 04 Nov 2014 15:46:06 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166773 The court denied the petitioners' claim for remission of demurrage charges during a strike period at the Port of Bombay. The court found that the petitioners failed to demonstrate sufficient cause for remission due to their delay in seeking relief, lack of urgency, and the absence of staff participation in the strike. The court dismissed the claim based on laches, emphasizing the importance of timely action and specific circumstances in rejecting the petitioners' request. The court ruled in favor of the respondents, discharging the rule with no order as to costs. Case-Laws Customs Tue, 29 Nov 1983 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166773