<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (11) TMI 115 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=252798</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the penalties and demands imposed on the appellant for wrongly availed CENVAT Credit on advertisement services for exempted goods. It ruled that the appellant&#039;s reliance on legal precedents was not applicable in this case, where the final products were fully exempted. The Tribunal concluded that CENVAT Credit for advertisement services on exempted goods was not admissible, affirming the Order-in-Original and dismissing the appeals.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2015 16:01:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=368059" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (11) TMI 115 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=252798</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the penalties and demands imposed on the appellant for wrongly availed CENVAT Credit on advertisement services for exempted goods. It ruled that the appellant&#039;s reliance on legal precedents was not applicable in this case, where the final products were fully exempted. The Tribunal concluded that CENVAT Credit for advertisement services on exempted goods was not admissible, affirming the Order-in-Original and dismissing the appeals.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=252798</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>