<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1983 (9) TMI 300 - CEGAT CALCUTTA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166760</link>
    <description>The Tribunal acknowledged a patent error in its order, recognizing that the assumption that the appellants had not filed appeals was incorrect. The order dated April 7, 1983, was recalled, and the matter was set for re-hearing on merits. The appeal was allowed, and a fresh hearing was scheduled following the acknowledgment of the mistake in the Tribunal&#039;s initial decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 19 Sep 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2014 12:41:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=368053" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1983 (9) TMI 300 - CEGAT CALCUTTA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166760</link>
      <description>The Tribunal acknowledged a patent error in its order, recognizing that the assumption that the appellants had not filed appeals was incorrect. The order dated April 7, 1983, was recalled, and the matter was set for re-hearing on merits. The appeal was allowed, and a fresh hearing was scheduled following the acknowledgment of the mistake in the Tribunal&#039;s initial decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 Sep 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166760</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>