<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1983 (11) TMI 292 - CEGAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166750</link>
    <description>Processing duty-paid PVC resin by intimate mixing with plasticisers, stabilisers, fillers and lubricants, followed by extrusion into granules, was treated as manufacture because it produced a homogeneous, commercially distinct product with different physical and mechanical properties, name and use. The resultant PVC compound or moulding granules were held classifiable under Item 15A(1)(ii) of the Central Excise Tariff, since that entry covered synthetic resin materials in forms including granules and moulding powders. Captive consumption within the factory did not exclude duty; Rule 56A was identified as the relevant relief mechanism rather than a levy exemption.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 Nov 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2014 11:03:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=368043" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1983 (11) TMI 292 - CEGAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166750</link>
      <description>Processing duty-paid PVC resin by intimate mixing with plasticisers, stabilisers, fillers and lubricants, followed by extrusion into granules, was treated as manufacture because it produced a homogeneous, commercially distinct product with different physical and mechanical properties, name and use. The resultant PVC compound or moulding granules were held classifiable under Item 15A(1)(ii) of the Central Excise Tariff, since that entry covered synthetic resin materials in forms including granules and moulding powders. Captive consumption within the factory did not exclude duty; Rule 56A was identified as the relevant relief mechanism rather than a levy exemption.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Nov 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166750</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>